Monthly Renaissance
Renaissance
Islamic Journal·Pakistan
Articles
All ArticlesWritersTopics
Issues
All IssuesSpecial Issues
QueriesE-BooksSupport
Monthly Renaissance
Renaissance
Islamic Journal·Pakistan

A journal of Islamic research in continuous monthly circulation since 1991. Published by Al-Mawrid.

Read
ArticlesIssuesQueries
Browse
WritersTopicsE-Books
About
AboutTeamSupportContact
Monthly Renaissance
EST. 1991 · LAHORE
MADE WITH ♥ BY TABLETURNERR.COM
© 2026 AL-MAWRID
Archive/Vol. 13 · № 9/Regarding Historical Āhadīth
ARTICLE ID q280
In this issue
Surah al-Baqarah (17-25)Researcher’s Companion to Ghamidi’s Surah al-Baqarah (17-25)Directives relating to WidowsChristian Proselytisation Among MuslimsA Resume of Arabic PhilosophyThe Character of a Happy Life

Reading
2 min · 353 words
Hadith & Sunnah
— Hadith & Sunnah —

Regarding Historical Āhadīth

AZ
Adnan Zulfiqar
September 2003 · 2 min read

There are some Āhadīth that seem to be of a ‘historical’ nature, recounting stories that do not seem to make any sense. It is acceptable to leave these Āhadīth and not consider them?

With regard to the issue of accepting ‘historical’ Āhadīth that don’t make sense to us, the issue of ‘acceptance’ must first be clarified. It should be clear that the Sunnah (simply put: the established or perpetual practice of the Prophet (sws), and Prophets before him) is distinct from Hadīth. Āhadīth itself are not an independent source of the Sharī‘ah, nor a necessary component of it. However, this does not preclude the importance of Āhadīth literature as an important means of ascertaining information on the life of the Prophet (sws), historical occurrences of the time, the Prophet’s perfect example, and even elements related to his religious understanding. Having placed Āhadīth in their proper place, there are certain principles regarding acceptance or rejection of a Hadīth, upon which a person can apply the Hadīth to their actions or thoughts. Of these principles, one of them relates to a Hadīth not negating established fact or reason. However, it is vital that two things be kept in mind. First, a person must be sure that a Hadīth he believes to be against reason is not simply a Hadīth that he is failing to properly understand. There is a distinct difference between something being misunderstood, as opposed to, unreasonable. Second, the determination of the acceptance or rejection of a particular Hadīth should primarily be left to scholars trained in this field. This is primarily because it often happens that one Hadīth might give a particular sense which is in direct opposition to the sense obtained from examining all pertinent Āhadīth related to the topic. This is in addition to a scholarly examination of whether the Hadīth in question fulfills the other requirements for acceptance, for instance, it should not negate the Qur’ān, etc.

Bearing this in mind, in the case you mentioned, if the ‘historical’ Hadīth makes no sense to you, despite your best efforts/intent to understand it, then it is fine to disregard it.


AZ
Adnan Zulfiqar

View all articles →
— Related reading —

‘Ali (rta) as the leader of the Arabs

1. ‘A’ishah (rta) حدثنا أبو العباس محمد بن أحمد المحبوبي ثنا محمد بن معاذ ثنا أبو حفص عمر بن الحسن الراسبي ثنا أبو عوانة عن أبي بشر عن سعيد بن جبير عن عائشة رضي الله عنها أن النبي صلي اللّٰه عليه وسلم...

Dr. Shehzad Saleem · 14 min

Enemies of the Ahl al-Bayt

1. Abu Hurayrah (rta) حدثنا عبد اللّٰه حدثني أبي ثنا تليد بن سليمان قال ثنا أبو الحجاف عن أبي حازم عن أبي هريرة قال نظر النبي صلي اللّٰه عليه وسلم إلي علي والحسن والحسين وفاطمة فقال أنا حرب لمن حاربكم...

Dr. Shehzad Saleem · 6 min

Love for Ali (rta)

حدثنا أبو نعيم الحافظ لفظا حدثنا أبو الفرج احمد بن محمد بن جورى العكبري ببغداد حدثنا إبراهيم بن عبد اللّٰه بن مهران الرملي حدثنا ميمون بن مهران بن مخلد بن أبان الكاتب حدثنا أبو النعمان عارم بن الفضل ح...

Dr. Shehzad Saleem · 2 min
Tools

Cite
Adnan Zulfiqar (2003). Regarding Historical Āhadīth. Monthly Renaissance, 13(9).